|
Author
|
|
Stephen K. Hone
Moderator
Registered: February 2002
Posts: 3,505
|
|
|
|
David Mills
Shy Guy
Registered: April 2003
Posts: 3,520
|
|
|
A classic car ruined by a broken nose and a set of black eyes. This is obviously the result of going 10 rounds with a JCB, either that or a botox injection gone wrong. Used to love the 75's looks, now - welll I don't.
|
|
|
|
nashed_uk
Supporter
Registered: October 2002
Posts: 105
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel power
Registered User
Registered: April 2003
Posts: 17
|
|
|
|
|
old oiler
Registered User
Registered: September 2003
Posts: 49
|
|
|
|
|
RSVRNige
Registered User
Registered: November 2003
Posts: 15
|
|
|
|
|
Sejin26
Trader Supporter
Registered: November 2003
Posts: 9,257
|
|
|
|
|
nectanglen
Registered User
Registered: August 2003
Posts: 79
|
|
|
|
|
nectanglen
Registered User
Registered: August 2003
Posts: 79
|
|
|
I like the new 75's profile and I am sure that the grill will grow on me.
|
|
|
|
|
kevsterjw
Registered User
Registered: July 2003
Posts: 458
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Minty
Former R8 '92 214Si Owner
Registered: November 2003
Posts: 2,469
|
|
|
The look suits the MG ZT but seems to ruin the R75... I love the original 75's looks and the classic styling cues from classic Rovers but I'm not sure where these ones come from? The SD1? The original 800? Or it is a rip off BMW? And we all know what happened the last time Rover wanted to be the British BMW....
|
|
|
|
|
Caz
Will we win next season?
Registered: September 2002
Posts: 2,670
|
|
|
Horrible, horrible front end. Looks like they set Mike Tyson lose on it. Much prefer my Dads 02 75.
|
|
|
|
|
crutley
Registered User
Registered: February 2003
Posts: 140
|
|
|
Why? What was wrong with the old one? They need the replacement 45 & 25 first. Does this mean the 45 & 25 will now get the goofy joined up head lights as well in a third face lift for what are still Rover 200's & 400's underneath? Hey, I've got another goofy marketing trick they could try to scrape together another few sales. When they join all the headlights together on the 45 & 25 they can then call them 200, 400 again & perhaps the 75 the 800. Now that would be totally scraping the barrel but aren't they almost doing that already here?
|
|
|
|
|
Peter32
Registered User
Registered: April 2004
|
|
|
:sad: This is an awful look. Like 1 of a dozen. Seems like an "impress" from a new Honda Accord. I loved very much the classic 75 style. However I understand, that they want to change something on a 5 year old look. But why this? The original 75 was the most beautiful car ever. Must be understand, if a company has a luck to own a classical look, which is really uniqe, don't change it, or not change it to a nearly completely different. I also wonder, why needed the "Rover" letters to the back side tailgate. Seems like a cheap far east or asian car. Bad work. I hope to change back as fast as can.
|
|
|
|
|
Rossy
Registered User
Registered: August 2004
Posts: 169
|
|
|
|
|
MG-Rover.org Forums
